General Mills invests in organic to boost sales, ‘do the right thing’

Source: iStock

General Mills’ splashy commitment last year to double the number of organic acres it sources from by 2019 not only is a strategic business move to boost sales, but part of a larger effort to “do the right thing,” according to the company’s organic ambassador. 

Katrina Heinze explained at the USDA Agricultural Outlook Forum in Washington, DC, Feb. 23-24 that the food giant expects to meet its goal of sourcing organic ingredients from 250,000 acres by 2019 as part of a larger mission “to treat the world with care.”

“The food we grow for all our products depends on a clean watershed … and an operational ecosystem. And we know that the ecological farming practices related to organic can contribute to that,” she said, explaining that by doubling organic acreage, General Mills can “help more farmers do that across the supply chain.”

General Mills is achieving this ambitious goal by investing directing in much-needed organic research, which Heinze says is “really cool” because it is not in a “lock box that only organic can use,” but rather “can apply across the whole agricultural continuum.”

Specially, the company is investing in specialized crops and conducting organic oat variety trails.

The company also is encouraging farmers to transition to organic by paying for associated transition costs, providing education, and developing a market for all the crops used in organic rotations and not just the primary crop.

General Mills also strives to send “clear market signals” to farmers considering organic transition by letting them know that there is a 10-plus year market ahead and that the company will be with them consistently through that period, Heinze said.

Strong sales helps General Mills do the right thing

Of course, “doing the right thing” by supporting the development of organic crops is easier when there is also a strong financial argument to do so – as in the case of organic.

By increasing its organic acreage, General Mills is on track to grow its natural and organic portfolio to $1 billion by 2019, Heinze noted at the conference.

She added that organic is compelling because “it is not the niche product of the past.”

For example, she noted a recent Hartman Group study shows four out of five Americans bought organic products in the last three months and more than a third of those are heavy users who buy organic weekly.

She added, “contrary to mythology, it is not just millennials who are buying organic … all generations are participating.”

Likewise, research shows income also is no longer a factor in who buys organic, Heinze said. “Consumers are willing to make lifestyle tradeoffs in order to buy organic.”

Many do so because they see it as a shortcut for finding healthy products – an idea that industry must work to preserve, Heinze said.

“Organic is a shortcut for consumers and that shortcut has created growth that we see in the market, but that only works if organic is a legitimate shortcut that really builds consumer trust,” she said.

To protect that trust, she encouraged the organic industry to ensure its standards meet consumer expectations and that those standards are consistently enforced.

Related News

General Mills names Jeff Harmening as its new CEO

Jeff Harmening to take the helm at General Mills on June 1: 'He is not afraid to challenge the status quo'

California-based Nona Lim raises $3m in seed round funding

Nona Lim raises $3m to expand its noodles, soups, and broths empire

What is in General Mills' innovation pipeline?

What's new on shelf from General Mills this summer?

Snacks and cereals are being launched under a range of brands

General Mills unveils key snacking and cereals lines for winter 2016

USDA calls for comment on organic check-off proposal

USDA calls for comment on organic check-off proposal as demand for organic outstrips supply

OTA develops interactive website to assist with organic exports

Related Products

See more related products

Comments (2)

SIR - 21 Mar 2017 | 01:17

Organic is the "right" way...

Unless you want to continue to poison humanity by providing them with foods that their bodies are not meant to digest and live with, as well as damage the Earth with non-organic food procedures that destroy the land and water. Furthermore, taking money out of the equation would allow all of humanity to eat, and eat what's actually good for their bodies. In addition, going "organic" doesn't actually mean it will cost more, in fact it can cost less. So kudos to General Mills for doing the "right" thing(a statement I never thought I'd make), and shame on you(Michael P.) for contributing to the destruction of the Earth. Wake up people and do some research, stop being so stupid and lazy!

21-Mar-2017 at 01:17 GMT

Michael P. - 02 Mar 2017 | 05:16

Is going all Organic really "doing the right thing?"

In an era when hunger is still a major issue, especially childhood hunger, as so many radio PSA's would have me believe, isn't "the right thing to do" maximizing production at the lowest cost to provide the most affordable food supply? General Mills themselves have acknowledged that affordable meals are an issue by supporting Feeding America on packages. Unless Organic can provide the same yield and cost as conventional farming, support for these two initiatives would seem at odds with each other.

02-Mar-2017 at 17:16 GMT

Submit a comment

Your comment has been saved

Post a comment

Please note that any information that you supply is protected by our Privacy and Cookie Policy. Access to all documents and request for further information are available to all users at no costs, In order to provide you with this free service, William Reed Business Media SAS does share your information with companies that have content on this site. When you access a document or request further information from this site, your information maybe shared with the owners of that document or information.