WhiteWave, Blue Diamond Growers, targeted in plant ‘milk’ class actions

WhiteWave, Blue Diamond Growers, targeted in almondmilk lawsuits

To the frustration of the dairy lobby, false advertising lawsuits objecting to terms such as ‘almondmilk’ and ‘soymilk’ have failed to make much headway. However, complaints filed this week vs Blue Diamond Growers and WhiteWave Foods adopt a different mode of attack, arguing that consumers are being duped into believing that almondmilk is nutritionally equivalent – or superior to - dairy milk.   

Rather than dwelling exclusively on alleged violations of the standard of identity for milk (a debate that’s recently been reignited via The Dairy Pride Act), plaintiffs in lawsuits* filed by Lee Cirsch at Capstone Law APC focus on the nutritional differences between Almond Breeze/Silk almondmilk and 2% dairy milk, arguing that the former lack the vital nutrients inherent in dairy milk, but are marketed as if they are more nutritious.

‘Defendant’s entire marketing strategy portrays its almond beverages as nutritionally superior to dairy milk…’

According to the proposed class action lawsuit against Blue Diamond Growers,* filed in the Superior Court in Los Angeles county, Almond Breeze is misbranded because Blue Diamond has “deceptively informed and led its customers to believe that they were purchasing, for a premium price, a dairy milk alternative that is nutritionally equivalent, and even superior, to dairy milk.”

Plaintiff Cynthia Cardarelli Painter claims: “By calling its almond beverages ‘milk,’ a term historically used to define cow’s milk, defendant has capitalized on reasonable consumers’ understanding of the well-known health benefits and essential nutrients that dairy milk provides without actually providing those health benefits and essential nutrients.”

While Almond Breeze Original does contain added calcium carbonate potassium citrate and vitamins A, D and E, argues Cardarelli Painter; 2% fat dairy milk contains more protein, magnesium, phosphorus, potassium, riboflavin, pantothenic acid, vitamin B6, zinc, and folate.

“Defendant’s entire marketing strategy portrays its almond beverages as nutritionally superior to dairy milk…”

"I absolutely expect this [to see more similar cases filed]. I am currently defending just such a case that has been threatened by a class action plaintiff’s lawyer." 

Allan Zackler, partner, Wendel, Rosen, Black & Dean LLP

‘Imitation’ milk?

The plaintiff, who accuses Blue Diamond Growers of violating California’s false advertising and unfair competition laws, along with federal regulations mirrored by California’s Sherman Law, also argues that Almond Breeze should be labeled as ‘imitation milk,’ citing section 21CFR101.3 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act:

“A food shall be deemed to be misbranded if it is an imitation of another food unless its label bears, in type of uniform size and prominence, the word ‘imitation’ and, immediately thereafter, the name of the food imitated… A food shall be deemed to be an imitation and thus subject to the requirements of section 403(c) of the act if it is a substitute for and resembles another food but is nutritionally inferior to that food.”

"The ultimate success of this particular strategy may depend upon actual consumer sentiment, which may be tested by consumer surveys.  But demonstrating consumer understanding and perception of the nutritional attributes of any food or beverage is challenging, particularly as even health scientists who study such matters often disagree as the science evolves.”

Adam Fox, managing partner in the Los Angeles office of Squire Patton Boggs  

In a lawsuit against WhiteWave filed by the same law firm, plaintiff Melanie Kelley notes that, “Defendant even provides a ‘compare to dairy’ link on each Silk almond beverages webpage that attempts to highlight the health advantages of its products as compared to fat-free dairy milk, yet fails to highlight nearly all of the essential vitamins provided in fat-free dairy milk that are significantly reduced or non-existent in the Silk almond beverages.”

Legal analysis: ‘I think the plaintiff is going to run into some problems at the certification stage’

So what do legal experts make of the case? A fertile new line of attack for plaintiff’s attorneys, or a stretch too far?

Ryan Kaiser, chair of the class action and business litigation team at law firm Amin Talati Upadhye, told FoodNavigator-USA that the new line of attack could prove more effective than simply going after the name (almondmilk), but that the plaintiffs could still face an uphill battle in their bid to get a class certified.

He added: “In terms of strategy, if they have the facts to support their allegations, I think plaintiff’s claims may have teeth on the merits. 

"But I think the plaintiff is going to run into some problems at the certification stage given that a large portion of almond milk (and soy-, and rice-, and coconut-, and macadamia-, and every other type of “milk” beverage out there) consumers buy the products for reasons other than nutritional equivalency to dairy milk. 

“Some drink it for ethical reasons.  Others for the taste.  Still others drink it precisely because of its nutritional differences from milk [for example, almond milk has less sodium than dairy milk, is lower in sugar and calories, and has less saturated fat than 2% or whole milk]. I suspect that’s going to be a hurdle for them.”

Plaintiff will need to present consumer perception data

As for the ‘imitation milk’ angle, he said: “The defendant may argue that the product isn’t a milk substitute/imitation, and thus isn’t subject to 21 CFR 101.3. But if they’re marketing and labeling it as such, I don’t see that argument having legs…

“But again, it comes back to certification. Where do those claims [eg. that Almond Breeze is a ‘deliciously creamy alternative to dairy and soymilk’] appear?  How often?  How long have they been used?  How many members of the proposed class are likely to have seen and relied upon the claims?  Unless it’s a claim that appeared on the label without interruption for significant period of time, variability in the labeling and marketing will make class certification difficult.”

In terms of consumer data to support the allegations, he said, “I think it’s going to be absolutely necessary for Plaintiff to present consumer perception data (in the form of an admissible survey) showing not only that consumers perceive the product to be nutritionally equal to dairy, but also that its material in their purchasing decisions.”

PLAINTIFFS FACE UPHILL BATTLE

"These cases attempt to litigate an issue that has already been decided. Courts have found, as matter of law, that no reasonable consumer would confuse plant-based beverages, such as soymilk or almond milk, with dairy milk because of the word 'milk.'

"The 'nutritional equivalency' angle is a new approach, and I would bet that it results from the proposed DAIRY PRIDE Act, which makes a similar claim – but I don’t think it will be effective... Courts have rejected the argument that consumers are confused between the products, and the nutritionals for each product are clearly set out on their Nutrition Facts panels.

"For the same reasons, I would expect courts to reject plaintiffs’ argument that almond milk should be labeled as 'imitation milk.'  That regulation applies where a substitute food cannot otherwise be distinguished from its traditional counterpart and where it has no 'common or usual name.' The FDA uses 'imitation crabmeat' as an example (61 FR 29702). Courts have already found that plant-based milk products are properly identified by their 'common or usual names' and that these terms are understood by consumers."

Rebecca Cross, Davis Wright Tremaine LLP  

Could this be the start of something?

So could this be the start of a new wave of plant ‘milk’ lawsuits, despite the challenges raised by the attorneys we've spoken to?

Possibly, said Kaiser: “It’s not hard to imagine that the firm that brought this suit isn’t also evaluating every other soy-, almond- and rice-milk producer and cranking out cookie-cutter complaints, or demand letters.”

However, one line of defense could be to argue that such cases should be stayed on primary jurisdiction lines should the FDA decide to take a look at this issue in light of requests from lawmakers and other groups, he said.

"Over time, standards of identity were used offensively by certain portions of the food industry, e.g. dairy, chocolate, juice, to keep competitors from using the established names on products similar to those following SOIs.  It was my impression that these efforts were less about consumer protection and more about protectionism. It often was used with effect to keep these other products out of the market.  If the products were not nutritionally equivalent there were then deemed to be 'imitation.' Obviously calling something 'imitation' isn’t particularly helpful to selling the product, which of course was the whole point of the exercise."

Defendants will "likely argue that no sentient consumer would be misled by either the nomenclature itself or the claims."

Allan Zackler, partner, Wendel, Rosen, Black & Dean LLP

Representatives from Blue Diamond and WhiteWave Foods both told FoodNavigator-USA that they do not comment on pending litigation.

*The cases are: Cynthia Cardarelli Painter et al v Blue Diamond Growers, BC 647816; Melanie Kelley et al v WWF Operating Company, dba Whitewave Services, 1:17-cv-00117

"The Almond Board of California is not privy to this lawsuit, however we can provide some context around almond milk: Nutrition facts are clearly stated on all packaged foods, including almond milk, allowing consumers to make choices based on their individual nutrition and lifestyle needs. 

"Almond milk is appealing for a variety of reasons. The product has no saturated fat or cholesterol, many varieties are fortified with calcium and vitamin D, and unsweetened products can have 0 grams of sugar and as few as 30 calories per serving. It is also a satisfying option for people who are looking to avoid lactose or eat fewer animal products."

Carissa Sauer, Manager, Industry Communications, Almond Board of California

Related News

Picture: istockphoto-HandmadePictures

Plant Based Foods Association to FDA: Plant-based 'milks' are properly labeled

Ripple ‘Not Milk’ campaign brands almond milk a ‘sham’

Ripple ‘Not Milk?’ campaign brands almond milk a ‘sham’ and tackles dairy over sat fat, sugar and sustainability

The Dairy Pride Act, says supporters, simply requires the FDA to enforce standards of identity already enshrined in law

Dairy Pride Act is 'anti-competitive' and 'unconstitutional,' says Good Food Institute

Pic: ©iStock/Dasha-Efremova

Vox Pop: Should the term 'milk' be regulated?

The new MALK label ...(minus the 'milk')

MALK ditches word ‘milk’ from labels: ‘We want to clear any confusion… MALK is not nut milk pretending to be dairy’

NMPF CEO Jim Mulhern (left) and IDFA CEO Dr Michael Dykes (right) testified at a House Agriculture Committee hearing on the farm bill this week. Picture: NMPF

NMPF takes on plant-based ‘milk’ at House Ag committee hearing: ‘It’s a battle and we intend to win’

WhiteWave Foods blasts ‘plant milk’ lawsuit as a 'waste of time'

WhiteWave blasts ‘plant milk’ lawsuit: ‘This is nothing more than a waste of time and judicial resources’

WhiteWave Foods lambasts ‘plant milk’ lawsuit as a 'waste of time'

WhiteWave blasts ‘plant milk’ lawsuit: ‘This is nothing more than a waste of time and judicial resources’

Judge: 'The FDA should at the very least have the opportunity to decide whether it will address the issue'

Court stays Whitewave almondmilk lawsuit: 'Whether plant-based 'milk' should be deemed an 'imitation' fits squarely within the FDA’s authority

Sales of almond milk rose 38% in 2014, according to IRI multi-outlet data

Almond Breeze almond milk only contains 2% almonds, claims false advertising lawsuit

Leading brands of almond milk are mostly water, sugar and thickeners, claim plaintiffs

Judge takes wind out of plaintiffs’ sails in ‘2% almonds’ false advertising class action vs WhiteWave, Blue Diamond

Miyoko’s Kitchen CEO weighs into plant-based dairy debate

Miyoko’s Kitchen CEO weighs into plant-based dairy labeling debate: It’s time to ditch ‘outdated and arcane’ standards of identity

Dairy Pride Act wastes government resources, says change.org petition

Dairy Pride Act a ‘waste of government resources’ says Good Food Institute in change.org petition

The issue of whether plant-based 'milks' mislead shoppers and violate FDA standards of identity has been tested a few times in the courts

Is it legal to call plant-based beverages from nuts, seeds and legumes, ‘milk’?

The FDA took issue with the term 'soy milk' in 2008 and 2012 via warning letters, but has since maintained radio silence on the plant 'milk' debate... Picture: istockphoto, HandmadePictures

Will the plant-based ‘milk’ debate prompt a wider probe of federal standards of identity?

Related Products

See more related products

Comments (3)

Mark Wareing - 06 Apr 2017 | 12:00

Almond water

The nutritional content of an unsweetened almond "milk alternative" I have seen in the UK suggests 'almond water' would be a better description. Whole milk is 3% protein, 4% fat and 5% carbs compared to 0.4% protein, 1% fat and zero carbs in the milk alternative. Tricalcium phosphate presumably is responsible for the 'milky' appearance - there is twice as much naturally-occurring calcium in milk. This seems misleading to me - after all one does not drink almond milk for its flavour, so what is the point?

06-Apr-2017 at 12:00 GMT

Jennifer - 30 Jan 2017 | 07:52

Hey, let's sue Phillips' too!

I think the lawyers are missing a huge problem if they don't sue whoever manufactures Phillips' Milk of Magnesia, too! How many people have been fooled into drinking THAT because of the word "milk" in he label? Oh, the humanity! And what about the "milk of human kindness"? Should all of humanity be thrown I jail for peddling THAT "imitation" of cow's milk? Has anyone checked to find out how many people have been taken to the emergency rooms for trying to eat antique milk glass, thinking that it had the nutrition of milk somehow locked inside? Really! Perhaps if the dairy industry actually listened to consumers and started treating the cattle, and the environment with respect and left it back to the honest small farmers to raise small herds and provie good employment for their rural American neighbor's again, the dairy industry would not be losing so much ground to its humane, vegan competitors. But solving the problem at its roots is not an option for the greedy leaders who think they can make a quick buck by doing everything the wrong way. Let them find out that that they can't continue "business as usual" because the consumer won't permit it. Too bad Trump turns his back on these kinds of desperately needed reforms. Anybody else notice that he never targeted the trip layers in his pledge to "drain the swamp"? If he did, consumers would soon stop having to pay for these sorts of ridiculous anti-capitalist protectionist lawsuits.

30-Jan-2017 at 19:52 GMT
MORE COMMENTS

Submit a comment

Your comment has been saved

Post a comment

Please note that any information that you supply is protected by our Privacy and Cookie Policy. Access to all documents and request for further information are available to all users at no costs, In order to provide you with this free service, William Reed Business Media SAS does share your information with companies that have content on this site. When you access a document or request further information from this site, your information maybe shared with the owners of that document or information.