American Heart Association: A clean label doesn't necessarily make for a 'healthy' product

Picture: istockphoto-dkapp12

Consumer research indicates that for many shoppers, ‘healthy,' is all about foods that are organic, minimally processed, natural, non-GMO, or free of artificial ingredients. But such factors should not be included in the legal criteria for 'healthy' claims on pack, argues the American Heart Association (AHA).

In comments submitted to the FDA as part of its probe into 'healthy' claims on food labels, AHA president Steven R. Houser, PhD, observed: “Consumers’ views of health and wellness are becoming more inclusive as they are defined by more than nutrient content.

For example, respondents in the IFIC 2016 Food and Health survey reported that a healthy food is defined, in part, by being organic, fresh, unprocessed, natural, free of artificial ingredients and additives, and having few ingredients.”

But he added: “Definitions for many of these factors are not clearly defined in law nor agreed upon by stakeholders. Furthermore, and perhaps more importantly, there is not sufficient scientifically sound evidence linking them to health outcomes.”

Criteria should not vary on a category-by-category basis

That said, the FDA should move away from a ‘healthy’ definition that is narrowly focused on a handful of nutrients “to one that requires foods to meet both food and nutrient criteria,” he said.

We support reserving ‘healthy’ for products that satisfy the 2015‐2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans’ recommendation to consume a variety of nutrient‐dense foods and beverages, i.e., those that ‘provide vitamins, minerals, and other substances that contribute to adequate nutrient intakes or may have positive health effects, with little or no solid fats and added sugars, refined starches, and sodium…ideally…in forms that retain naturally occurring components.’

“We believe this to be distinct from products that may be ‘better‐for‐you’ choices (compared to other similar products within a given category, i.e., relative comparisons), but that do not have an overall composition and nutrient profile consistent with the intent of the dietary guidelines. If consumers selected foods only from the latter category, their overall eating patterns would likely fail to achieve recommendations.”

“Consumer understanding of health and nutrition can be influenced by non-authoritative sources which may be in direct conflict with established dietary guidance.”

General Mills (in comments submitted to the FDA as part of its probe into 'healthy' label claims)

AHA: Added sugars should be limited in products making ‘healthy’ claims

As for some of the main bones of contention highlighted in industry comments, the AHA believes that added sugars should be controlled in ‘healthy’ foods, and that limits on saturated fat should remain part of the criteria, although it recommends removing total fat limits.

On the thorny issue of whether fortified foods should be able to make ‘healthy’ claims, the AHA believes that “the beneficial nutrients that establish a food’s ‘healthy’ claim should occur intrinsically in food,” but then goes on to add that exceptions can be made.

This does not necessarily mean that fortified foods cannot bear the “healthy” claim, but rather that they could not rely on fortification to establish eligibility for the claim.

“For example, we support fortification of foods bearing the healthy claim to the extent that fortification is used to contribute shortfall nutrients to otherwise nutrient‐dense foods (such as the addition of calcium to 100% orange juice, folic acid to whole‐grain cereal, and vitamins A and D to non‐fat milk) or to meet a standard of identity (such as products containing enriched grains).

"Any fortification should be in accordance with FDA’s fortification policy which, among other provisions, does not consider it appropriate to fortify sugars or snack foods such as candies and carbonated beverages.”

“We believe that food production systems ultimately impact the quality and characteristics of food, and accordingly, it would be appropriate to consider such factors when defining the term “healthy” in food labeling.

“Going forward, OTA would like to encourage FDA to consider ways to incorporate the contribution of organic production practices and their impact on the quality and characteristics of food into your discussions on the use of the term “healthy” in the labeling of food products.”

Organic Trade Association (OTA)

Food labeling regulations currently mandate that ‘healthy’ can only be used to describe foods with 3g or less total fat and 1g or less saturated fat per serving (excluding fish and meat), while there are also limits on cholesterol and sodium, and minimum requirements for nutrients to encourage (vitamin A, C, calcium, iron, protein, or fiber).

There are no limits on sugar - added or otherwise.

However, FDA now says that it will not enforce current regulatory requirements for products that use the term ‘healthy’ if they:

(1) Are not low in total fat, but have a fat profile makeup of predominantly mono and polyunsaturated fats; or

(2) Contain at least 10% of the Daily Value (DV) per reference amount customarily consumed (RACC) of potassium or vitamin D.

Read the FDA’s recent guidance on ‘healthy’ claims HERE.

Interested in learning more about meal-kit metrics? Join Sun Basket and Terra's Kitchen at FOOD VISION USA 2017 in Chicago on November 13-15:

Related News

Photo: IFIC

US consumers ‘sorely lack’ nutritional literacy, according to IFIC survey

IFT 2017: Clean label moves beyond the ingredients list

IFT 2017 part two: Clean label moves beyond the ingredients list

Odwalla 100% orange juice has no added sugar ... but is it allowed to say that on pack?

Odwalla under fire: Is it safe to make 'no added sugar' claims on 100% juice products?

'Healthy' is regulated as a nutrient content claim, but many consumers think the word is not just about nutrients

Comments in FDA docket reveals consumers’ shifting perceptions of ‘healthy’

Should butter, orange juice and cranberries be labeled as 'healthy'?

'Healthy' bones of contention: Stakeholders at odds over added sugar and saturated fat

What types of food, if any, should be allowed to bear the term ‘healthy?’

Oldways: ‘It’s time we stopped tying ‘healthy’ to a formula of nutrients divorced from actual foods’

Eggs are among the most affordable sources of protein and also have significant amounts of other nutrients, including vitamin D and choline, says United Egg Producers

Are eggs ‘healthy’? Outdated FDA labeling rules don’t reflect latest science, says United Egg Producers

Submit a comment

Your comment has been saved

Post a comment

Please note that any information that you supply is protected by our Privacy and Cookie Policy. Access to all documents and request for further information are available to all users at no costs, In order to provide you with this free service, William Reed Business Media SAS does share your information with companies that have content on this site. When you access a document or request further information from this site, your information maybe shared with the owners of that document or information.