FDA: You can't call HPP-treated juice ‘fresh'... (But can you call it ‘raw’?)

Suja: HPP "destroys pathogens while preserving crucial vitamins, enzymes and nutrients"

High pressure processing (HPP) has breathed fresh life into the US juice market. But if beverage firms are excited about the technology, so, it appears, are plaintiffs' attorneys, who are starting to take issue with the way some HPP-treated products are being marketed.

So what can and can’t you say about HPP-treated foods and beverages without getting into legal hot water?

With respect to the word ‘fresh’ on food labels, the law is clear*, an FDA spokesman told FoodNavigator-USA: “No, you can't call it ‘fresh ‘if you put it under HPP [see regulation 21 CFR 101.95 click here]."  

With respect to the word ‘raw’, however, there is no specific regulation, which is why the makers of some HPP-treated juices are now being targeted in a new wave of lawsuits.

Is ‘raw’ the next ‘natural’ in the food litigation stakes?

The latest firm in the firing line is San Diego-based Suja Life LLC, which is accused of duping shoppers into paying over the odds for HPP-treated juices by labeling them as "organic, raw and cold pressed', when in reality, alleges plaintiff Rebecca Heikkila, they are "nothing more than run-of-the-mill processed juices".

(The packaged has since been updated and now says 'organic and cold-pressured'.)

Heikkila's complaint, filed on February 5 in California - comes hot on the heels of a similar lawsuit filed by the same law firm (Bursor & Fisher, P.A.) against Hain Celestial over the marketing of its BluePrint HPP-treated juices (click here)**.

Suja juices have a 30-day shelf-life, unlike genuinely ‘raw’ juices that “must be consumed within days”, she adds: “This artificial extension of the lifespan of the juice products violates the fundamental principles underlying the raw food movement, consumers’ expectations, and industry standards.

“A direct and unavoidable result of the use of HPP is the destruction of the enzymes, nutrients, probiotics, and minerals that, but for HPP, would be found in the juice products…"

Avure Technologies: HPP products should be considered raw

So is she right?

Not surprisingly, leading HPP provider Avure Technologies Inc (which is not named in the lawsuit, and is commenting independently as an expert on the technology, not on this lawsuit specifically), says HPP doesn't have the destructive effects claimed.

Indeed, says Errol Raghubeer, Ph.D., VP, microbiology & food technology at Avure, one of the primary reasons firms use HPP rather than traditional heat-pasteurization is precisely because key nutrients are not damaged.  

He told FoodNavigator-USA: “Under the HPP conditions used for the commercial application of HPP to juice and other food products, vitamins such as ascorbic acid, niacin and folic acid in orange juice; bioactive compounds such as chlorophyll and lutein in wheat grass; phytochemicals such as chicoric and chlorogenic acids in Echinacea purpurea; and food enzyme systems such as polyphenol oxidase and pectin methyl esterase, among others, are not affected.”

Asked about probiotics, he said: “Most probiotic microorganisms (strains of lactic acid bacteria) are not significantly inactivated under these processing conditions. These strains of bacteria quickly reach original population levels after HPP.

“These are the primary microbiological determent of the shelf life of HPP products and it is the reason, together with the control of enzyme activity, that HPP products require refrigeration for microbiological and chemical stability and should be considered raw.”

What will this case hinge upon?

But will such technical details be the key to defending this case, or will it hinge upon whether reasonable consumers would consider HPP-treated juices to be 'raw'?

William Dance and Matthew Kaplan, LA-based attorneys at law firm Tucker Ellis LLP, told FoodNavigator-USA that Suja could try to argue that primary jurisdiction applies (ie. the FDA should weigh in on this issue), but noted that at the dismissal stage the case will "most likely hinge upon whose definition of 'raw' seems more reasonable and whether, or how, that can be demonstrated". 

They added: "At one end of the spectrum is plaintiff; her definition is based on the views espoused by believers in 'raw foodism'... At the other extreme is the view that raw simply means not cooked.  By all accounts, defendant’s products fall somewhere in between; its juice blends are not cooked, but neither are they totally unprocessed."

However, Rebecca Cross, an attorney at San Francisco-based law firm BraunHagey & Borden LLP, argued that consumers generally understand 'raw' to mean unheated, adding: "No reasonable consumer could think that packaged juices are not processed in any way." 

The judge, she said, should take inspiration from Pelayo v. Nestle USA Inc., et al (2:13-cv-0521), in which the court dismissed with prejudice 'natural' allegations concerning Nestle's Buitoni pastas, "finding no reasonable consumer could think that the products sprung from ravioli trees or tortellini bushes"

What is high pressure processing?

HPP allows products to be treated in their final packaging, with flexible containers carrying the product into a high-pressure chamber, which is flooded with cold water and pressurized.

The pressure causes lethal damage to the cellular structure of bacteria, molds and yeasts, but maintain colors, textures, flavors and nutrients that can be damaged by heat treatment, enabling firms to significantly increase the shelf-life of products and retain their ‘clean-label’ credentials by avoiding additives.

While the capex costs can be high for smaller manufacturers to buy their own HPP equipment, a toll manufacturing infrastructure has built up whereby several companies will feed product into a central HPP facility, said Manny Picciola, managing director and partner in L.E.K. Consulting's Chicago office.

“I think we’re just at the tip of the iceberg in terms of the potential for this technology. It’s being used in everything from guacamole to deli meats, juices and petfood. But the Holy Grail application is probably ground beef.”

Plaintiff Rebecca Heikkila, who seeks to represent a nationwide class, alleges violation of the Magnuson Moss Warranty Act, breach of express warranty, breach of the implied warranty of merchantability, unjust enrichment. She also seeks to represent a sub-class of California consumers, and alleges violation of the state’s Consumers Legal Remedies Act, its Unfair Competition Law, and False Advertising Law.

Suja told us on Monday night that it had "not been served", adding: "If and when if we are, we will submit a comment at that time."

The case is Heikkila v Suja Life LLC (3:14-cv-00556 ) filed in the US District Court, Northern District of California. 

*Asked whether having 'fresh' in your brand name could be problematic if you make HPP-treated juices, the FDA said if could not comment on individual brands or companies, but said: "If the use of the term 'fresh' in a brand name suggest/implies that the food is unprocessed or unpreserved, the requirements in 21 CFR 101.95(a) would apply."

A spokeswoman for Starbucks (which owns the Evolution Fresh brand), told us: "Our juices are clearly labeled as being high pressured processed, and we do not market them to suggest otherwise."

Related News

Garden of Flavor launches first HPP juices with probiotics

Garden of Flavor launches first HPP juices with probiotics

Selected flavors from the Coldpress range

‘The Poster Boys of HPP!’: Coldpress takes smoothie fight to Innocent

Merck: “We will give VWR access to more Merck Millipore products..."

Merck signs food analytics deal in western Europe

Image: Daniel Wehner/Flickr

HPP shows 'greatest promise' among modern beverage processing techniques: Study

Judge: 'The articles the plaintiffs cite contradict the allegation upon which their entire complaint hinges.'

Judge tosses HPP-treated juice lawsuit vs Hain Celestial; says plaintiff derailed his own case

Suja Juice HPP juices 2014 revenues to be north of $40m in 2014

From a standing start in September 2012 to revenues 'north of $40m' in 2014; the astonishing rise of Suja Juice

HPP cold pressed Suja Juice predicts 2015 revenues of $70-80m

Suja Juice predicts revenues of $70-80m in 2015 as super-premium juice category explodes

Evolution Fresh cold pressed juice smoothies have caught the attention of Starbucks

It’s getting juicy in the functional beverage aisle: Juices see success with healthy and natural positioning

Suja Juice generated revenues of $18m in 2013, $45m in 2014 and is forecasting $70-80m in 2015

Coca-Cola takes minority stake in Suja Juice: ‘This is a huge complementary opportunity for us’

Juice in focus at BevNET Live, V8, Evolution Fresh, Suja, Bolthouse

Campbell Soup on reinventing V8: 'Your brand has to be almost willing to die to survive, to shed its skin and start again...'

Edmundo Romo

Avure to expand its HPP capabilities in Mexico

Source: E. Crawford

Evolution Fresh blends coconut milk with juice to reduce sugar in new Organic Superfoods line

HPP is moving into new applications from babyfood to premium nut milks

Avure on new directions for HPP, and the real takeaways from those FDA warning letters…

While many people think about HPP in terms of killing pathogens and extending shelf-life, it can also help formulators reduce fat and sodium, improve texture and 'clean up' product labels

Could HPP be the secret weapon in the battle to reduce sodium?

Pressure situation! Hain Celestial faces $5m+ juice court claim on HPP

Pressure situation! Hain Celestial faces $5m+ juice court claim over HPP

Suja claims it organic cold-pressed juices 'deliver vital nutrients and purposeful refreshment'

Boulder Brands spends $8.8m on Suja juice: ‘One of the hottest Whole Foods brands’

Related Products

See more related products

Comments (3)

R Sweeney - 14 Feb 2014 | 08:09


It is disingenuous to refer to a HPP product to a "run of the mill" thermally processed juice. VERY different from a chemical and flavor perspective.

14-Feb-2014 at 20:09 GMT

Shawn Sugarman - 12 Feb 2014 | 07:45

HPP and Raw

You can't legally sell unprocessed juices through the grocery channel. You are required to do something to the juice to eliminate the potential for harmful pathogens. HPP impacts the flavor and nutrients the least of all commercial purification methods. Hardcore raw foodies can only legally buy their "3 day" juice directly from a juice bar and the bottle they take home must have a warning label telling consumers that the product is potentially dangerous to consume. HPP is the best juice you will find in the grocery store, unless the store has its own cold pressed juice bar.

12-Feb-2014 at 19:45 GMT

Submit a comment

Your comment has been saved

Post a comment

Please note that any information that you supply is protected by our Privacy and Cookie Policy. Access to all documents and request for further information are available to all users at no costs, In order to provide you with this free service, William Reed Business Media SAS does share your information with companies that have content on this site. When you access a document or request further information from this site, your information maybe shared with the owners of that document or information.