Kellogg to pay millions in kids’ attention class action settlement

Kellogg has frosted attention-improving claims for this and other cereals

The Kellogg Company will pay consumers up to $2.75m over misleading kids’ attention claims for its Frosted Mini-Wheats cereals, after a federal judge reached a class action settlement.

Kellogg agreed to pay disgruntled consumers who bought the cereals that claimed to be “clinically shown to improve children’s attentiveness by nearly 20%” between $5 and $15 each from a fund of $2.75m.

It also agreed to give $5.5m to charities working to improve nutrition among underprivileged American citizens, pay $2m in costs, and cease making the attention claims for three years.

The settlement follows a similar 2009 settlement with the increasingly claims-active Federal Trade Commission (FTC) where Michigan-based Kellogg agreed to amend immunity claims.

Washington DC-based legal firm, Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, observed that although Kellogg could no longer make that specific claim, it could make similar claims if it could back them with appropriate data.

“Kellogg may make claims about the impact on attentiveness from eating the product, as long as it limits and qualifies its claims,” the firm said in a blog.

It said statements such as, “Clinical studies have shown that kids who eat a filling breakfast like Frosted Mini-Wheats have an 11% better attentiveness in school than kids who skip breakfast,” could be acceptable under the settlement if backed by appropriate evidence.

But despite recent FTC settlements with Nestle and Iovate Health Sciences that have highlighted the fact such substantiation must include two randomised, clinical trials, there is no official standard in place.

Indeed at the recent NutraIngredients weight management virtual trade show, FTC attorney Devin Domond affirmed that the FTC views such substantiation matters very much on a case-by-case basis.

Joel Rothman from the Florida office of the legal firm Arnstein & Lehr noted no such standard was in place.

“The FTC standard of adequate and substantial scientific evidence has always been elusive,” he said.

“This settlement does not clarify the issue. However, prior settlements between FTC and Kellogg’s did,” he added referring to the FTC- Frosted Mini-Wheats settlement of April 2009, and a settlement over unvalidated immunity claims being made for Rice Krispies reached in March this year.

In the April 2009 Frosted Mini-Wheats settlement, the FTC stated only that, “competent and reliable scientific evidence means test, analyses, research, or studies that have been conducted and evaluated in an objective manner by qualified persons and are generally accepted in the profession to yield accurate and reliable results.”

To see how the claims were made on television click on exhibit A and B at the bottom of this page.

Related News

Cinderella supplements: not enough scientific substantiation

FTC raps Disney supplements for “bogus health claims”

Kellogg's has agreed to pay $5m for immunity claims it used for a mere six months

Kellogg’s to pay $5m for false Rice Krispies immunity claims

Nutella manufacturer faces lawsuit over nutrition claims

Kellogg settlement on attention cereal claims rejected

Kellogg settlement on attention cereal claims rejected

Kellogg had claimed on pack in 2008 that Frosted Mini-Wheats were 'clinically proven' to improve children's attentiveness by 20%

Kellogg’s $4m Frosted Mini-Wheats class action gets final nod

Court concerned at the near 75% cash drop in latest Kellogg Frosted Mini-Wheats settlement

Kellogg to cough up $4m in revised Frosted Mini-Wheats settlement, but court concerned

Will you join industry colleagues at the Metropole in Brussels on December 1 for the best health claims information Europe offers?

NutraIngredients health claims conference is two days away

POM: The legal saga rolls on

FTC bombs POM (and researchers beware)

Kellogg's new antioxidant labelled cereal makes 'no health claims'

Class action may follow FTC-Nestlé settlement

Kellogg’s escapes FTC fine over false immunity claims

Kellogg’s settles Rice Krispies immunity claims dispute

Related Products

See more related products

Comments (1)

Nigel Potrzebie - 25 Nov 2010 | 08:54

Just a case of missing info

Bah, this is just a case of missing info. It IS true that kids eating the stuff will be more alert; Kellogg.s just forgot to say that eating something else with calories in it will do the same. Along the same lines, a serving of Fruit Loops is excellent for young kids' breakfasts because it contains (in addition to yummy calories) TWO WHOLE GRAMS of fibre per serving. Seems to me that high-and-mighty critics should consider whether full disclosure should be made concerning fibre too. Something like "TWO whole grams of indigestible stuff to which solid digestive waste will cling to on their way to evacuation from Little Johnny's tum-tum. And it'll scrape and loosen stuck-on waste from yesterday's veggie supper." Yum YUM! (And HAAAhahahaha ... satiremaxxxxx. Never miss a chance :P)

25-Nov-2010 at 20:54 GMT

Submit a comment

Your comment has been saved

Post a comment

Please note that any information that you supply is protected by our Privacy and Cookie Policy. Access to all documents and request for further information are available to all users at no costs, In order to provide you with this free service, William Reed Business Media SAS does share your information with companies that have content on this site. When you access a document or request further information from this site, your information maybe shared with the owners of that document or information.