One farmer adds balance to the public discussion about GMOs by sharing their sustainability benefits

Source: iStock

Contrary to what some may believe, farmers who grow genetically modified crops are “not the devil with horns,” and do have the planet’s and consumers’ health and best interests in mind when they select which seeds to plant and harvest, a Maryland farmer told attendees at USDA’s Agricultural Outlook Forum in Washington, DC, last month.

Chip Bowling, chairman of the National Corn Growers Association, explained that many politicians, environmental law advocates and EPA and USDA officials visit his farm in Newburg, Md., with a preconception that “I am the devil with horns and do things that don’t make sense, do things that hurt the environment because I use GMOs.”

He said this is a preconception shared by many Americans in part because some anti-GMO and GMO labeling advocates have aggressively delivered only one side of the GMO story, and he encourages farmers, ranchers and those who work with GMOs to raise their voices and tell the other side of the story.

He does this on his farm by taking visitors “on a walk on the conservation side of GMOs,” he says. And, he adds, by the time they leave they have a better understanding of why he and others farm GMO crops.

GMOs support sustainable farming practices

One of the major reasons Bowling tells visitors he uses GMOs is because they have allowed him to adopt sustainable farming practices that also allow him to make a profit – two sides of the same coin that are essential for him to continue farming.

“Because of GMOs, I have reduced my use of pesticides. I have reduced my use of herbicides, and it is hard to imagine, but if and when I need to use pesticides there is a product that I can use just 2 ounces of … that covers an acre of land,” he said, adding, “most people don’t know that … and they can’t believe that just that little bit of product works.”

In addition, the switch to GMO crops allowed Bowling to adopt conservation till practices, which he said, “help build up the soil and ease erosion and soil loss. In exchange, we get cleaner air, water and healthier soil.”

Specifically, he said that since 2006 when efforts were enacted to clean up the nearby Chesapeake Bay, he has decreased soil erosion by 57% and sediment loss by 63%, thanks in part to GMOs and the use of cover crops, which have tripled in the time period.

“Twenty-five years ago, when I was younger – a lot younger – we used to plow every acre of land. Now we plow nothing. Everything is no till and that is because the use of GMOs allowed us to do that,” Bowling said.

He also noted that by using GMO crops he has reduced nitrogen loss by 38% and phosphorus loss by 45%, which he says, “are amazing numbers.”

Previously all of these elements – soil, nitrogen and phosphorus – would drain into the river near his farm where he crabs, fishes and hunts and where his children play.

“There is nothing that I am going to do as a farmer that is going to negatively affect that river,” including planting GMO crops, and “most farmers feel the same way,” he said.

He said he hopes that by opening his farm to visitors and discussing transparently how and why he uses GMOs that the public’s perception of the agricultural technology will become more balanced. But for this strategy to be most effective, he notes, other farmers and ranchers also must talk transparently about their use of GMOs and the benefits they provide not just for the farmer, but for the planet and public. 

Related News

5 GMO food myths dispelled

5 GMO food myths dispelled

Dr Roger Beachy: 'Who is a legitimate arbiter of what is sustainable in agriculture?'

GMO pioneer: I got into biotech because I wanted to reduce the use of chemical pesticides

10 things you always wanted to know about GMOs…

GMO Answers: Biotech's big guns seek to claw back initiative in GM debate

The pro-GMO labeling lobby may be peddling “bad science”, claims Mark  Lynas. “But it is good politics. Who can disagree with the right to know what is in your food?”

Bad science, good politics? Why the GMO labeling lobby is winning the PR war...

Related Products

See more related products

Comments (1)

farmer - 02 Mar 2017 | 08:14

Mineral poor GMO crops

Unfortunately, the use of herbicides like RoundUp chelates minerals in the soil and in plants. That's why the weeds die- they starve. With the use of herbicides, the resultant commodity FOOD crops are also mineral poor, and lead to chronic diseases in the human end consumers. Mineral deficiencies in humans show up as cancer, allergies, autism, Alzheimers, atherosclerosis. Foods grown without herbicides, certified or not, don't have that mineral paucity.

02-Mar-2017 at 20:14 GMT

Submit a comment

Your comment has been saved

Post a comment

Please note that any information that you supply is protected by our Privacy and Cookie Policy. Access to all documents and request for further information are available to all users at no costs, In order to provide you with this free service, William Reed Business Media SAS does share your information with companies that have content on this site. When you access a document or request further information from this site, your information maybe shared with the owners of that document or information.