Converting native land to organic farms has ‘unintended consequences’ on biodiversity, economies

Converting native land to organic farms has ‘unintended consequences’

To increase supply of organic and avoid the financially challenging three-year transition period necessary to convert conventional farm land, some producers are converting native ecosystems to organic farms – a practice that the National Organic Standards Board wants to discourage.

“Over the last two years the NOSB has received public comment describing loss of high value conservation and fragile ecosystem acreage when farmers transition to organic production,” in part because when lands are converted from a wild, “non-productive” state the three-year transition period for organic certification may be eliminated, the regulatory advisory committee writes in a discussion paper prepared for its semi-annual meeting in Denver this week.

This “unintended consequence” of the three-year transition requirement, “has negative impacts on biodiversity and, in the longer term, on economies,” and as such goes against the conservation of natural resources and biodiversity, which is a primary tenet of organic production, NOSB argues.

NOSB is proposing changes to the organic regulations to discourage conversion of native land to organic farms, by adding to the land requirements two clauses. One would require producers to actively monitor and, where possible, improve plant and animal biodiversity on the farm and not convert native ecosystems or high value conservation lands to agriculture use in the future.

The second would require that producers have not converted native ecosystems or high value conservation lands to agricultural production in the last five years.

At the meeting this week, NOSB also will ask stakeholders to provide more details on the conversion of high value lands and fragile ecosystems, consider how to define high value conservation land and fragile ecosystems, look for ways to better protect these lands under USDA organic certification and brainstorm other incentives or disincentives to prevent such conversion.

Diverging paths to success

The Cornucopia Institute and the Organic Trade Association both support NOSB’s intention, but believe different tactics are appropriate.

Noting that it is “disturbing” that organic regulations “actually encourage the immediate conversion of native lands to organic crop production because doing so eliminates the three-year transition period required when converting from conventional cropland,” The Cornucopia Institute agrees with the idea to prohibit eligibility of converted native lands for five years “at a minimum.”

OTA also supports NOSB’s efforts to eliminate the incentive to convert native ecosystems to organic production, but suggests doing so “is extremely challenging” as the transition period is rooted in law and regulations.

“We cannot require additional time for transition under any circumstance without an act of Congress to amend the Organic Foods Production Act and the USDA engaging in notice and comment rulemaking to amend the organic regulations,” OTA explains in comments to the NOSB Certification, Accreditation and Compliance Subcommittee.

Obviously, drafting a guidance would be a faster option, but it would not hold the same weight and enforceability as a law or regulation, it adds.

Encourage conversion of conventional farm land

With this in mind, OTA suggests NOSB take a different approach to discourage native land conversion by making it easier to convert existing conventional farm land.

“The incentive to convert native lands to organic production is due largely to the financial burden producers shoulder when they decide to convert their farms to organic,” OTA says in comments. “We encourage CACS also to consider ways that USDA could better support farmers through transition and increase the incentive to convert currently farmed land, rather than native land, to organic.”

For example, it suggests aligning organic farming practices with those eligible for financial support from NRCS through its Conservation Stewardship Program.

“Small steps to support farmers transitioning land from conventional production to organic can go a long way in reducing the incentive to convert natural ecosystems,” OTA concludes. 

Related News

Trump administration sees four ways to help ag punch above its weight

Trump administration sees four ways to help ag ‘punch above its weight’

Organic status of hydroponics back on the docket at NOSB

Organic status of hydroponics back on the docket at NOSB semi-annual meeting this week

OTA sets high bar for revised organic seed-purity standards

OTA sets high bar for revised organic seed-purity standards

Source: iStock

NOSB’s vote to delist carrageenan viewed as ‘dangerous precedent,’ restrictive

Related Products

See more related products

Submit a comment

Your comment has been saved

Post a comment

Please note that any information that you supply is protected by our Privacy and Cookie Policy. Access to all documents and request for further information are available to all users at no costs, In order to provide you with this free service, William Reed Business Media SAS does share your information with companies that have content on this site. When you access a document or request further information from this site, your information maybe shared with the owners of that document or information.