VIDEO: Will we need a new regulatory framework for clean (cultured) meat?

Loading the player...

Producing ‘clean’ meat by culturing cells – instead of raising or slaughtering animals - is a new frontier in food production, but will it require a new regulatory framework, and what should we call it? Elaine Watson caught up with one food law attorney to find out more.

Speaking to FoodNavigator-USA at the IFT show in Las Vegas this week, Davis Wright Tremaine counsel Rebecca Cross said: “I think there are some misperceptions out there in the industry that these products are not regulated, or regulators don’t know what to do with them, or that there is some kind of regulatory gap, and that’s just not the case.

“These products can be regulated under the existing regulatory and statutory scheme.”

Both the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and US Department of Agriculture (USDA) are closely monitoring developments in the burgeoning cell cultured meat industry – whereby companies such as Memphis Meats, MosaMeat, Hampton Creek and SuperMeat are looking to build commercial scale production facilities for ‘growing’ meat from cells that differentiate into fat, muscle, and connective tissue cells, without using live animals, said Cross.

I think that the initial entry point for conversations will be with the FDA

She explained: “Regulators are very much expecting these products to come on the market … The National Academy of Sciences recently issued a report that was done at the request of several agencies including the FDA and the USDA, which looked at these products and other products that are anticipated to come out in the next 5-10 years.

"And the report specifically referenced clean meat – they referred to it as ‘cell cultured meat’ – as an area for high growth potential and also an area that can be regulated under existing regulations."

She added: “I think that the initial entry point for those conversations [between clean meat companies and the US government] will be with the FDA and the report, as I read it, referenced that as well. The companies and attorneys in this space are [already] having conversations with the agencies in order to prepare them for more formal conversations when the final products are in the market.”

Clean meat is food

But should regulators treat clean meat in the same way as produced from raising animals, or is it something else?

Said Cross: “Clean meat is food, it’s a whole food, it’s not a drug, a new animal drug, an additive, a supplement or anything else, and the way regulators regulate whole foods is through post market mechanisms. They don’t actually require any pre-market approval process.”

But she added: “That being said it’s in everyone’s interests to make sure that regulators and companies are on the same page as to how these products will be regulated ensuring that everyone knows they are safe for consumers. So I expect there will be a consultation process with the FDSA and potentially also with the USDA, but it will be a voluntary process.”

“We are following the developments in this area and, as always, are willing to engage with firms on the relevant safety and legal requirements for products they intend to market.”    

FDA spokesperson, 6.30.17

"FSIS has not made any determinations on 'cultured meat' (i.e., animal species-specific tissues cultivated in vitro from livestock stem cells)... FDA would need to evaluate the safety of 'cultured meat' first before FSIS could make any type of labeling determinations and determine whether it meets the definition of 'meat.'"

USDA FSIS (food safety and inspection service) spokesperson, 7.5.17

Labeling: What should we call clean meat?

So what should we call cell-cultured meat, and will regulators likely require a special kind of label/descriptor that differentiates it from the kind raised from animals?

Currently, the FDA has three ways it allows companies to label their products, observed Cross: “By a standard of identity if there is one, by a common or usual name if there is one, or by an appropriately descriptive term. So using any of those paradigms the products could be called meat, hamburger, poultry, fish, or a species of fish or whatever the individual products might be.

“In addition to that however, I’d expect companies would want to [voluntarily] advertise the benefits of their products as being free from animal slaughter and clean.”

If cultured meat is 'clean,' what does that say about regular meat?

In other words, from a legal perspective, regulators will likely conclude that meat is meat, whether it’s grown in-vitro [outside the animal] or in-vivo [inside the animal]. However, companies in the cultured meat space will likely seek to actively promote the fact that they are not raising or slaughtering animals both from a marketing perspective (sustainability, animal welfare) and from a desire to be completely transparent with consumers, she predicted.

As to what kinds of terms firms might use, the term 'clean' meat [which is grown in a sterile environment] is likely to get some industry push-back (given the tacit implication that the regular variety is 'dirty), while terms such as 'lab-grown,' 'invitro' or 'cultured' meat are not very consumer friendly, acknowledged speakers at an education session on clean meat at the IFT show on Monday afternoon.

Read more about clean meat HERE and HERE.  

'Meat' per se may satisfy regulators, but for full transparency, companies in the cultured meat space will likely want to describe it in such a way that it is clearly differentiated from its farm-raised counterpart, predicted speakers at an education session on clean meat at the IFT show on Monday afternoon.

Products described by column B are those that represent an expansion of the familiar set of organismal hosts and genetic pathways, for which there are few comparators but nonetheless well-established approaches to assessing risk. Examples include animal cell culture–derived products (such as cowless meat or leather) and plants for bioremediation, decoration, or other environmental or consumer use.

USDA and FDA have a long history of coordinating their complex shared jurisdiction to regulate food safety. Thus, for example, FDA has exclusive regulatory jurisdiction over live animals intended to be used for food, but USDA oversees slaughter and processing of meat and poultry.

Synthetic food products, such as synthesized meat and eggs produced without the intermediation of animals, appear to fall outside the definitions of non-GE meat and egg products that FSIS regulates and responsibility for the safety of such products would lie primarily with FDA.

Future Biotechnology Products and Opportunities to Enhance Capabilities of the Biotechnology Regulatory System Report from the National Academy of Sciences, March 2017

Interested in finding out more about clean meat (plus the plant-based variety) and cutting edge new technology enabling firms to produce animal proteins via microbial fermentation?

Register for FOOD VISION USA 2017 in Chicago on November 13-15 and get the lowdown on clean meat from The Good Food Institute senior scientist Dr Liz Specht and how Geltor is producing gelatin without animals. See the latest speaker list HERE

Related News

IFT 2017: Gums, stabilizers, advantame, and stevia

IFT 2017 part three: Plant-based formulation challenges, and where next for stevia?

Photo: Perdue Farms

Poultry producer Perdue Farms modifies its animal welfare policy

Impossible Foods is the brainchild of Stanford biochemist and genomics expert Pat Brown, PhD, MD, who has described industrialized meat production as "the most destructive technology on Earth."

Impossible Foods' total funding hits $257m: 'We can satisfy the world's voracious demand for meat, without destroying the environment'

Picture: istockphoto-aireowrt

Hampton Creek explores the potential of mung bean protein isolate

Cargill joins funding round for clean meat co Memphis Meats

Cargill and other 'food industry giants' join $17m funding round for clean meat co Memphis Meats

Picture: Memphis Meats

What's the path to commercialization for clean meat?

IFT 2017 Clean meat, clean label, jackfruit, green banana flour

IFT 2017 part one: From clean meat and clean label, to green jackfruit and banana flour

The Memphis Meats team (senior scientist Eric Schulze is on the bottom left). Picture credit: Memphis Meats

Memphis Meats: We'll have ‘clean meat’ products in grocery stores by 2021

Hampton Creek: 'We believe we can produce meat and seafood that is over 10x more efficient than the world’s highest volume slaughterhouse'

Hampton Creek to enter clean meat market in 2018: 'We are building a multi-species, multi-product platform'

Memphis Meats unveils cultured chicken, duck meat

Memphis Meats unveils poultry meat (without raising animals): ‘An unprecedented milestone for clean meat'

Cashew-based milk brand A tal da Castanha has a simple, clean label

SPOTLIGHT ON BRAZIL Plant-based foods, beverages: 'We're sensing a tremendous business opportunity,' says GFI

Related Products

See more related products

Submit a comment

Your comment has been saved

Post a comment

Please note that any information that you supply is protected by our Privacy and Cookie Policy. Access to all documents and request for further information are available to all users at no costs, In order to provide you with this free service, William Reed Business Media SAS does share your information with companies that have content on this site. When you access a document or request further information from this site, your information maybe shared with the owners of that document or information.