Microbiome 'disruption' in early life linked to obesity in adulthood

Researchers have identified a key window for gut bacteria development, suggesting that the disruption of key bacteria types can lead to an increased risk of obesity.

Certain gut bacteria  could help to shape our metabolism in early life, while disrupting these bacteria appears to increase the risk of obesity in later adulthood, say researchers.

Published in Cell, the mouse study suggests that certain microbes shape their hosts' metabolism very early in life and that disrupting, for example through exposure to antibiotics, during infancy can cause metabolic changes that appear to increase the risk of obesity in adulthood.

Led by Martin Blaser from the NYU Langone Medical Center, the research team said that their findings provide further steps in identifying which gut bacteria are crucial to metabolic health - adding that such information could be used to help restore levels of those helpful microbes and promote healthy metabolism in adulthood after an infant encountered microbiome disruption due to illness or from medical treatments such as antibiotics.

"We identified infancy as a critical window where host metabolism is especially vulnerable to microbiota disruption with antibiotics," said Blaser. "This highlights a need for judicious use of antibiotics in clinical practice in early life."

The team also noted that the research characterises important variables in early-life microbe-host metabolic interaction and identifies several taxa consistently linked with metabolic alterations.

Study details

Blaser and his colleagues noted that it has been previously suggested that the microbes which begin to colonise the gut at birth can be easily disrupted during infancy - and that this can have a long-term effect on weight. Indeed, farmers in the USA have been taking advantage of this phenomenon for decades by exposing livestock to low doses of antibiotics to promote growth.

Building on this, the research wanted to examine whether the exact timing and duration of early exposure to antibiotics could make a difference, as well as identify specific bacteria that may protect against the potentially harmful health effects. To address these questions, they gave long-term, low-dose penicillin treatment to two groups of mice: 4-week-old mice after weaning and mouse mothers beginning shortly before their pups' birth.

They found that earlier penicillin exposure led to more substantial obesity in adulthood and worse metabolic health, especially in males. Early exposure to antibiotics also reduced levels of several types of potentially protective bacteria and exacerbated the effects of a high-fat diet on obesity, said the team.

Indeed, in a separate experiment, the researchers found that only 4 weeks of antibiotic exposure beginning shortly before birth was sufficient to produce obesity, which lasted well after penicillin treatment ended.

"These temporal changes indicate that low-dose penicillin suppresses multiple taxa that typically peak early in life. Although high-dose (therapeutic) antibiotic exposures reduce microbiota diversity in animals and humans, low-dose penicillin increased phylogenetic diversity at 4 weeks, which is consistent with decreases in particular prominent taxa and detection of taxa with lower representation," wrote the researchers. "By sampling across time, we identified microbes that were altered prior to the development of adiposity, suggesting roles in host metabolic development."

Furthermore, Blaser and his colleagues noted that it is the alteration of our gut microbiota, rather than use of antibiotics per se caused these metabolic changes:

"Our findings imply that restoring good bacteria could prevent the long-term metabolic effects of early antibiotic exposure," explained Laura Cox, first author of the study.

"We identified four candidate bacteria that may be metabolically protective, and we're working on follow-up studies to determine if we can prevent weight gain by giving these bacteria back following antibiotic therapy."

Source: Cell
Volume 158, Issue 4, 14 August 2014, Pages 705–721, doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.05.052
"Altering the Intestinal Microbiota during a Critical Developmental Window Has Lasting Metabolic Consequences"
Authors: Laura M. Cox, Shingo Yamanishi, et al

Related News

Mice implanted with C. ramosum from a human gut are at a higher risk of obesity when eating a high fat diet, say researchers.

Gut bacteria type plays role in obesity risk from high fat diet

Prebiotic promise? Granny Smith apples could help battle obesity by helping the growth of friendly bacteria in the colon due to their high content of non-digestible compounds, including dietary fibre and polyphenols, and low content of available carbohydrates.

Can an apple a day keep obesity away?

The rate at which our gut bacteria mature during infancy may have a big impact on later weight gain, suggest researchers.

Early microbiome development impacts later weight gain

Western lifestyle may limit gut bacteria diversity: Study

Western lifestyle may limit gut bacteria diversity: Study

Microbiome changes may be key to better metabolic health in obesity

Microbiome changes may be key to better metabolic health in obesity

Lower diversity in gut microbiome could be associated with more unhealthy eating behavior and greater obesity, suggest researchers.

Gut feelings: Researchers suggest microbiota may manipulate eating behaviours

“Our results demonstrate that incorporation of appropriately modified bacteria into the gut microbiota has potential as an effective strategy to inhibit the development of metabolic disorders."

GM probiotics reduce insulin resistance and body fat: Mouse data

“We now have the potential for matching probiotic strains with specific end-user needs," said the researchers.

‘A basis for the future selection of probiotics’: Study shows how gut bacteria communicate with host to regulate weight

Comments (1)

Klaus J.Seelig,MD - 28 Aug 2014 | 05:11

What sort of food is given during and after PC-dosaging ?

The sort of fuel given to any engine is decisive for performance and durability. When reading this report I wondered, whether the "normal bulk-feed for the mice" was documented as specially analyzed and known for its content of C3-type, C4-type & GMO-transgene C3-->C4-type Carbohydrates and Proteins by IR-MS for the minute differences of all organic matter. Not every motor designed for light-petrol may be fuelled with "energy-dense" Diesel. We know that all Mammalia are relatives, at least with their Metabolism. Like-wise weaning baby-mice suckling their mother’s-mice-milk who were fed on "normal" C3-rice might present different results of Microbiomata if the PRRI's new C4-rice is fed, both to the (milk-producing) mother-mouse as well as the later growing pup. [The same applies to other sorts of C3 vs C4-typer fodder-products.] Some Energy-problems are only to be understood, if minor details like Isotopes are taken seriously. There are stereo-isotopomerics with some energetic variation at each single Co-enzyme-A- related metabolic step which by slower turn-over disturb the "normally" rapid enzyme activities. So already by alteration of "normal" occurrence those slightly but significantly heavier molecules lagging behind will only show up to be of significance, if this point has been in Focus of Research. [As MRN show us clear variations in all mammals investigated, the question of what is behind that mythos is justified. WATSON’s recent interpretation of Diabetes as a Free-Radical-Disease appears to point to the same direction.] It is known that organic molecules are selected by numerous Iso-Enzymes for their various isotopes and even variant stereo-isomeric positions (f.i. for processing various isotopomeres of Lactic acid). And the Hatch-Slack-Pathway (used f.i. for processing ²D-tagged and/or ¹³C-bearing ‘bricks’) produces more ADP than "normal" Glycolysis is used to produce to keep the energetic Homoiostasis balanced. So if the cells call for 'more energy needed’ this signal means “asking for increased Insulin-release” and may be caused by a normally balanced path-way for "certain metabolic bricks" of rather seldom occurrance to be clogged by food-borne "bricks" well-known as "energy-dense" which are just the ones to require using a different metabolic pathway to compensate for isotopes’ minute difference. So what may be well tolerated as a minor additive (of C4-type products) to ample light (C3-type-) bulk-feedlots may be of widespread significance. If addition of 10% are well tolerated, 30% may be OK at week-ends, but 100% on long-term-basis may be intolerable for any of the YOPI-Consumers. (I.e.:Young pups, Old Senescents, Pregnants of all Mammalia, and Immune-incompetent- or -PC-disturbed or 'moderated' Consumers sharing their Protein on basis of altered CAFO-Production). If the Factum of "Zero-Point-Energy"(as known since UREY-1931 and HEVESY-1942) is deliberately overseen due to energy-promoting (GRAS-Assumptive) Dogmata and (Commodity-) Production and Convenience as Official (assuming Common) Interest then there may be ample Research lurking and soon be well established to keeping a lucrative "Mythos" well covered. And if Fodder- and Food-Production is supported by Growth-Hormone and prophylactic low-dose Antibiosis with evidence of "excellent weight-gain" and that sort is valued higher than Consumer-Health- then there is Real Danger for Pandemic Collateral Effects. Because there will be difficulties for all Researchers to get the essentially needed financial basis for the only proper sort of proof about "Truth in the Pudding".

28-Aug-2014 at 05:11 GMT

Submit a comment

Your comment has been saved

Post a comment

Please note that any information that you supply is protected by our Privacy and Cookie Policy. Access to all documents and request for further information are available to all users at no costs, In order to provide you with this free service, William Reed Business Media SAS does share your information with companies that have content on this site. When you access a document or request further information from this site, your information maybe shared with the owners of that document or information.