Global ID: 'Demand for Non-GMO-Project verification doubled after Whole Foods put its GMO cards on the table...'

Loading the player...

The growth of the Non-GMO Project verification scheme has been nothing short of explosive over the past 18 months. But does the firm serving as its technical administrator have the resources to cope, and are competing certification schemes adopting the same standards?

Speaking to FoodNavigator-USA at the IFT show, Ken Ross, CEO of Global ID - which is the parent company of FoodChain ID, the technical administrator to the Non-GMO Project - said the trigger for much of the growth had been the March 2013 commitment by Whole Foods to label all products made with GM crops in its US and Canadian stores by 2018.

We've doubled our staff

"That within a month or two doubled the number of people who were enrolling and it has continued to increase since then, so we have been scrambling [to keep up with demand],” he said.

We've doubled our staff since then, and we're working day and night to catch up. It takes around nine to 12 months to train a senior evaluator... but our capacity should be meeting demand in I would say about three-to four months."

Non-GMO has become an accepted part of the food industry

Asked whether the process of getting certified is too arduous, he said: "More and more ingredient manufacturers are participating, and once they do it once, it gets easier [for manufacturers sourcing ingredients].”

As for what non-GMO actually means - which is different in different markets - he said: "There are already quite a number of non-GMO schemes globally… but we think we’ve got the right balance of meaningfulness and rigor.”

Finally, asked whether he thinks the writing is on the wall for GM crops, he said: "I don’t know if anyone has a crystal ball, but I certainly think non-GMO has become an accepted part of the food industry.

“Ultimately it will depend on consumer demand, but I don’t see it overtaking the mainstream food market any time soon.”

Related News

Lawsuit: "A reasonable consumer would understand that ‘natural’ products do not contain synthetic, artificial or excessively processed ingredients." Pic:

Whole Foods targeted in new lawsuit over 'all-natural' claims

Whole Foods: 'We recognize that Consumer Reports is a trusted publication and are looking into why their test results differ from ours.' (Picture:

Whole Foods hit with more lawsuits accusing it of dramatically understating sugar content in its yogurt

Picture: Daniel Lobo, Flickr

Colorado says NO to GMO labeling; Oregon heads to nail-biting finish

Whole Foods sued over non-GMO Project labels on Almond Breeze

Whole Foods sued over disputed Non-GMO Project logos on almond milk; but is this a one-off or a fertile new source of class action lawsuits?

Monsanto chief technology officer Dr Robert Fraley: 'GMOs aren't the only tool we need'

Monsanto exec: GMOs are not the Holy Grail. What they are is an important tool if used properly

What does it take to meet consumer demand for non-GMO foods beverages

What does it take to meet increasing consumer demand for non-GMO foods & beverages?

Pompeo non-GMO scheme would confuse shoppers, says Non-GMO Project

Pompeo bill would ‘create a competing Non-GMO label with drastically lower standards’, says Non-GMO Project

Source: iStock

Can “green” claims turn the GMO debate around in 2016, analysts ask

Axing GMOs from Cheerios has not boosted sales, says Gen Mills

Axing GMOs from Original Cheerios has not boosted sales, says General Mills

Josh Schonwald: 'Chefs are like rockstars in our culture today. People listen to them.'

IFT 2014: Chefs! Is it time to proudly serve GMOs on your table?

Vermont GMO labeling bill presents packaged food companies with ‘a serious quandary’, says Rabobank analyst

Vermont GMO labeling bill presents packaged food companies with ‘a serious quandary’, says Rabobank analyst

Comments (3)

streven - 01 Aug 2014 | 12:13


Is she speaking english??

01-Aug-2014 at 00:13 GMT

K. Grossmann - 11 Jul 2014 | 07:54

Cost of non-gmo to the consumer

Who will ultimately pay for non-gmo products in the US? Proponents seldom (if ever) talk about what this will mean to the average grocery shopper's wallet. Non-gmo certified foods are not cheap, to say the least. Given the state of the economy and the already sky high cost of food, when will the public say UNCLE? People need to be educated about the "cost effect". It is sadly lacking in most information I have seen published on the subject.

11-Jul-2014 at 19:54 GMT

Submit a comment

Your comment has been saved

Post a comment

Please note that any information that you supply is protected by our Privacy and Cookie Policy. Access to all documents and request for further information are available to all users at no costs, In order to provide you with this free service, William Reed Business Media SAS does share your information with companies that have content on this site. When you access a document or request further information from this site, your information maybe shared with the owners of that document or information.